Nuclear deterrence and the prevention of war: the case study of India and Pakistan

Authors

  • Shafaq Sultana Hussain Independent Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59111/JPD.001.01.019

Keywords:

Deterrence, Nuclear, War, Stability-instability, India, Pakistan

Abstract

There are a number of existing theories of deterrence, mainly nuclear deterrence, that explain how states avoid the probability of war when they acquire nuclear power. While most theories generally explain how states deter each other, there is also a deterrence debate between the IR scholars Kenneth Waltz and Scott Sagan over nuclear proliferation assuring security and nuclear proliferation increasing the threat of destruction. Similarly, the stability-instability paradox provides how deterrence lowers the likelihood of war, but the minor skirmishes continue. Under these different theories of deterrence, this paper studies the case of deterrence between India and Pakistan, the two nuclear neighbors and adversaries.

Author Biography

Shafaq Sultana Hussain , Independent Researcher

Shafaq Sultana Hussain is an aspiring researcher from Pakistan  with a BSC (hons) in Economics with interest in diverse areas of social sciences.
Her research interests revolve around issues of development and security, illegal immigration, foreign policy, and their impact on the economy and climate change.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Hussain , S. S. (2020). Nuclear deterrence and the prevention of war: the case study of India and Pakistan . Journal of Peace and Diplomacy, 1(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.59111/JPD.001.01.019